Photo by Nellie Adamyan on Unsplash
I originally wrote this five years ago, when he was president the first time (July 15, 2020); not so surprisingly, nothing has changed and the lies and deceit and cover ups keep rolling on . . . and the ways in which people crying about “saving the children” contort themselves into pretzels if the predators aren’t “the Liberal elite” rolls on, as well, just the same
anyway . . . here is what I wrote then, reposted (word for word)
. . . my thoughts on the women "supplying" young girls to Epstein and his rich friends:
there is not a week that goes by that I don't talk with a woman (from their 20's into their 70's) who isn't dealing somehow some way with the traumatic "remnants" of sexual abuse
the number of women impacted by this is monumental, way more than most people would like to "admit" -- and the effects, long after the fact, also monumental
what we do to children, to traumatize them, then gaslight them and jerk them around from then on in attempts to hide the shame of the abusers
is disgusting
there is no hanging judge, imo
who can be too harsh in dealing with the people associated with this dastardly affair
women who are sexually abused as children -- and, to me, a 13 or 14 year old girl is still a child and should be allowed to develop normally and watch music videos and play at being "a big girl" without being forced into sexually servicing old men
to whom they have no attraction
while being coerced into situations that are destructive to them, both short and long-term
any of these movements to "normalize" older men having intimate connections with children disgusts me
we spend too much time protecting rich men
and too little time protecting the vulnerable . . . and a 13 year old girl, no matter how tall she may be, how "developed" she may be, how anything she may be
is a child and needs to be allowed to develop socially and intellectually without being used as a "resource" for some man who can slip her some money after he slips her his dick
disgusting
all these men know what the fuck's goin' on -- and any woman who serves as the pimp to this bull shit also knows what's goin' down
if we created legislation that punished people who (seems pretty cut and dry to me) engage in sexual activity with young girls -- I see stories of men my age having "consensual sex" with 4 year olds and getting probation
this is INSANE
we need to protect these children and rather than all this bait and switch stuff like pizzagate
actually have meaningful, consistent, equally applied regardless of social status or influence
remedies in the court system
to "dissuade" people from continuing down this path, destroying (and then quickly discarding after the bloom "fades") these young girls
men who do this shit -- wt actual fuck ??
and women who recruit 13 year olds so 50 (or 75) year old men can rape them
wt actual fuck one more time
we say we're "against this" yet rich men continue to rape and pillage on and on and on
and we slap them on the wrist
and then actively campaign to belittle the women -- her dress is too short, she looked at me the wrong way, she kissed a boy in home room
madness
we spend all this effort to sexualize young girls -- this is insanity
and, like everything else in this dysfunctional shit show, is #designed to allow certain groups to use and then "fuck over" everyone else
it has to fuckn end
I have "job security" in some sense because this has happened so often to so many people
but I don't want this kind of job security
it has to end; all this sexual "fuckery" has to END
it breaks my heart every time
imagine what it does (and did) to the women with whom I speak
Tell it Andy!! 🔥
AND now Trump is doing the tariff dance… to distract.
Bastard needs to be behind bars now…
We don't just need new laws, we need a new legal system. Actually a new legal philosophy. Our legal system is still based on pre-Revolutionary British practices. The laws and punishments applied to litigants are based on 3 ideas 1: "the king can do no wrong," (state immunity), 2: elections make winners "honorable gentlemen" with certain legal privileges, and 3: aristocratic privilege. In the modern world, these three principles should be regarded as fallacies. First, we have no king and our government should not be treated like we did. (all Furhers aside). Second, elections confer nothing but that the constituents of that politician decided they were going to represent them, or (in some states) judge them. Honor is based on the individual's ethics, and cannot be conferred on someone by a King or an electorate. Third, aristocrats are the modern version of the Feudal lord and the various petty nobles hanging around the court. Judges in Old Limey were appointed by the King, who thus "conferred honor" on them by honoring them with an appointment. Lawyers in COLON-ial times were some of the most wealthy men (only one woman was ever "admitted to the bar" in Colonial Maryland, Mistress Margaret Brent, an ancestor, admitted to execute her late husband's will). This was because only rich white men could afford law school. Their wealth assured they were Red Dots, Brahman Caste. No others need apply. Today, anyone can be a lawyer but most become very wealthy and one thing I've observed about the monied caste is they protect each other. Compare this to the French legal system. But our system causes the rich white man to face a far less extreme justice than the rest of us. Money talks, rich pedos walk. End aristocratic privilege.